Strategy is a military term referring to the process of deciding the best environment, in which, your assets may be deployed to gain the maximum benefit. Obviously there is both good and bad strategy. Were that not the case there would be little demand for the book attributed to Sun Tzu, a ranking military general and strategist during the Chinese Wu dynasty in the late sixth century. It makes sense then that if one is fighting a war or engaged in business that good strategy would be a good objective.
Few need good strategy as badly as Entrepreneurs. Often success or failure depends upon the quality of strategy Entrepreneurs build to grow their businesses.
What does good and bad strategy look like, is a good question? Richard Rumelt posted a good article on the subject of strategy in the McKinsey quarterly, recently. He proposes that bad strategy has, at least 4 recognizable characteristics: Failure to face the problem, making goals strategy, bad objectives, and fluff.
Failure to face the problem
All too often leaders are more interested in surface appearance and rely upon the premise that few people read or care about the real problem, they simply want the problem fixed. So, they pen and present strategies that are surface and short-term centered. They often attempt to overwhelm those that might implement the strategy with "texture and detail," as Rumelt puts it.
Occasionally, executives will just ignore problems and try to replace them with past achievements. They may replace strategy with amazing goals and hope the problems go away, but we all know, hope is not a strategy (good or bad).
Making goals strategy
Many executives are great at setting audacious goals, goals that will "take your breath away" also hoping that the goals will take your mind off the need for strategy. One great warrior we are familiar with was George S. Patton. One of Patton's favorite quotations was from Frederick the Great: "L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace." Translation: Audacity, audacity, always audacity. But George S. Patton knew audacious goals were a tactic, not a strategy. He knew that choosing where to be audacious was more important that being audacious. So do not be tempted to dazzle others with audacious goals as a substitute for good strategy.
I am sure you have had experiences where leaders attempt to overwhelm followers with goals like: If you don't have a competitive advantage, don't compete (paraphrased and attributed to Jack Welch) or Win one for the Kipper (attributed to Knute Rockne). Both are goals but not strategy.
Bad strategic objectives
For those who do not believe in or understand the value of strategy, one of the most frequent ways they approach the process is to make sure the objectives are fuzzy. With fuzzy or unclear objectives you can hope that getting close to the goal will get you where you wish to go, but it will not. The most frequent way bad objectives are presented is through the planning process and having too many objectives.
Instead of identifying a few of the most important goals and developing a strategy to achieve them, executives are gathering all the goals and presenting them in need of strategy. the problem that presents is not all goals are achieved with the same strategy and unless an organization clearly knows those that are most important, it is very likely that bad strategy will be employed.
Fluff
This my favorite and possibly one of the most frequently used. Fluff is simply saying something that can be said in a few simple words with more and bigger words. Using jargon to express something simple. An example given by Rumelt, and I can site none better, is the bank that expresses its strategy as customer-centric intermediation. Look beyond the fluff and you get the bank's strategy is to be a bank. The customer-centric part is jargon and intermediation is a big word for taking deposits and then lending out the money. Bad strategy is often disguised by fluff. Another place where you will often find a lot of fluff is in an organization's vision and mission. Sounds good, but does it really mean anything? If you have to ask that question, it is not good strategy.
So what, then, is necessary to craft good strategy. I believe there are 5 important steps to crafting good strategy:
1. Carefully analyze the current condition- You can't know how to get to where you want to go unless you know where your are.
2. Vision where you want to be - Have a picture of where you want to be.
3. Understand - that tomorrow is not likely to resemble today. Assuming that next year, next month, next week will be just like today is a big mistake. Accept that we live in a world where change is exponential.
4. Develop a big picture plan - Coping with a changing world requires certainty of destination but flexible plans to get there.
5. Implement tactics - engage the people, equipment and capital to reach the destination
The key to good strategy found in these 5 points: analyze, visualize, know things change, get the big picture and implement. Follow these 5 steps to good strategy and enjoy the victories.
Stephen J. Blakesley is the host of the weekly Internet radio show: Entrepreneurs R Us http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sjb340. He is an Author and Speaker, His most recent books include: Strategic Hiring, The Target-The Secret of Superior Performance an How to Make the Next Hire Your Best Hire His blog is found at http://www.entrepreneursrus.com, please visit and comment.
Thank You!
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6416141